<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Heavy Oil:Oil sands blog,discussion and news.</title>
	<atom:link href="http:///?feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http:</link>
	<description>HeavyOil.org is an independent voice focussed on the Energy Sands industry. Topics range from subsidization to countering propaganda put out by oil companies and environmental groups.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 18:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Syncrude Ducks Responsibility.</title>
		<link>http:/?p=157</link>
		<comments>http:/?p=157#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 02:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Syncrude]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dead ducks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heavy Oil Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PR Disaster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tailings Pond]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http:/?p=157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Syncrude could have done more to protect ducks." So begins the first day in the Syncrude trial, which is scheduled to last as long as two months.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http:/?feed=rss2&amp;p=157</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oilsands and the Mackenzie Pipeline.</title>
		<link>http:/?p=147</link>
		<comments>http:/?p=147#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 07:04:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Sands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mackenzie Pipeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Energy Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil Sands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tar sands]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http:/?p=147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What this means for the Energy Sands is a cheap, reliable and stable supply of natural gas piped directly to the mines. Ultimately this will lower the cost of natural gas for heavy oil producers and increase profitability.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http:/?feed=rss2&amp;p=147</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Energy Sands And Copenhagen:Canada&#8217;s Lost Opportunity.</title>
		<link>http:/?p=115</link>
		<comments>http:/?p=115#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 21:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Athabasca Oil Sands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean energy bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copenhagen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dirty oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E-T Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heavy Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nevtah Oil Sands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil Sands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Royal Dutch Shell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tar sands]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http:/?p=115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The failure of the industry to properly market itself to the end-users of it's product combined with the recalcitrant schoolboy approach by the Canadian government to the opportunity to engage in meaningful dialogue and promotion of a valuable resource leave the industry and the country with a black eye.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http:/?feed=rss2&amp;p=115</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
